Posts

Showing posts from September, 2018

黎智英論中美貿易戰

黎智英論 中美貿易戰 唔講政治 , 睇睇佢經濟眼光準不準 https://hk.lifestyle.appledaily.com/lifestyle/columnist/%E9%BB%8E%E6%99%BA%E8%8B%B1/daily/article/20180930/20511092 志大才疏,時日無多 - 黎智英 ( 節錄 ) 習大帝志大才疏,皇朝中國必定大鑊。過去中美關係好好的,不好怎會順風順水,中美貿易讓中國經濟奇蹟繁榮近四十年,到習大大上台才搞到烏煙瘴氣。今天還打起中美貿易戰,把四十年來辛苦耕耘的豐功偉業推至摧毀邊緣 … 中國人民真的到了最危險的時候! 反之美國卻國運翻身形勢大好,還有個話做就去做的狂人川普做總統。他要求糾正中國貿易違規的手段,以及竊取外國生產商的科技,又迫使對方交出科技作為在中國生產貨物條件的乖張行為,目標清晰事在必行,而都是合情合理的要求 … 強弱易見,打下去中國必輸無疑 習大帝真的會帶中國人民回去公有化的大鑊飯,老毛舊路的死胡同嗎? 當然會!

Hong Kong’s No. 1 Bad Law?

Someone posted a thread online saying contempt of court was “Hong Kong’s No. 1 Bad Law”.  He went on that people criticizing a court’s judgement could be charged with this offence and thus suppressing freedom of speech. Obviously he was referring to the recent criticisms against Chief Justice Ma for his so called “lenient” judgement. I challenged him to give examples of people charged for criticizing a court’s judgement; he cited cases concerning newspapers and editors prosecuted for divulging details of cases while on hearing. I replied that it’s another kind of contempt of court, and not that he was referring to. Instead of letting debates continue, the website administration allowed him to blacklist me from further posting despite the fact that I did not contravene any of the website’s rules. This is exactly what Donald Trump has tried to block opposing voices on his own twitter. He was ruled by a US court for violating The First Amendment. Actually Article...

談言論自由 2018/05 發表

(1) 如果 Mr Bean 在香港, 會不會反對侮辱國旗法? 英國喜劇家、 Mr. Bean (路雲艾堅遜),牛津畢業的豆先生在報紙刊文,認為自由世界,最應該包容的,是 「互相侮辱的權利」(We must be allowed to insult each other) Mr Bean 是針對英國的「公安法」之第五條,此法禁止對宗教、文化、族裔一切被視為「侮辱」的言行.  但何謂「侮辱」,他說,定義越來越空泛,警方據「投訴」而辦事,也越來越頻繁。 Mr. Bean: We Must Be Allowed To Insult Each Other He criticised the "new intolerance" as he called for part of it the Public Order Act to be repealed, saying it was having a "chilling effect on free expression and free protest".  (2) 女權鬥士名句: "I believe in absolute freedom of expression. "Everyone has a right to offend and be offended” Taslima Nasrinis a Bangladeshi author and former physician with Swedish citizenship She advocates freedom of thought and human rights by publishing, lecturing, and campaigning. She has been unable to return either to her home in Bangladesh or to her adopted home of West Bengal, India (3) 網絡通行,在那些資訊和言論自由半開化的地區,暴民橫行,罵來罵去,開不得玩笑, 缺乏常識,一點雞毛蒜皮的事就人來瘋集體嚎叫 陶傑 (4) 言論自由 《世界人權宣言》第19 條及《美國憲法第一修正案》明言保障言論自由的權利,確認...

買金避險

#10 買金避險漏左呢段 the key to holding gold is to hold it in coin.  Paper gold and other such undertakings are to be avoided, because promises in times of crisis tend to vanish a blaze of rule books shredded when the going gets rocky.  The downside of gold is it is hard to store safely, so before you buy you should know where and how you are going to secure it.

投資股票都係避險

剛剛在網站發左呢貼 “ 市好弱 , 避險情緒高 ” 投資股票都係避險 ( Coming Financial Crisis ) 之一 , 除非係末日式的經濟爆㷛 economic collapse apocalypse) 香港有人不時唱香港經濟爆㷛, 其實美國人都有同樣憂慮. Forbes 在 2012 教人如何在財政危機時保障自己資產 Five Ways To Protect Yourself From The Coming Financial Crisis Intelligent Investing Ideas from Forbes Investor Team     2012 1.  Gold … however many don’t know that gold was confiscated during the great depression ( Executive Order 6102  is a  United States presidential   executive order  signed on April 5, 1933, by President  Franklin D. Roosevelt "forbidding the Hoarding of  gold coin , gold  bullion , and  gold certificates  within the continental United States". The limitation on gold ownership in the U.S. was repealed after  President Gerald Ford   1974 ) .   2.  Property Property has several things going for it. You can short money with it, that is to say you can borrow to buy. This is especially good ...

非黑即白和五毛

非黑即白和 五毛 死全家 原本是搜集有關 非黑即白 資料 , 冇意中發覺在某些家庭中 , 兩者有關連 .  首先講講五毛一詞來源 哈佛大學 著名政治学者 Gary King 利用被泄露的文件對中國的網路寫手進行了研究 , 認為中國政府及其支持者每年發出  4.48 億個帖子。這些為中國政府點贊的帖子很多出自佯裝做普通網民 , 99.3% 來自政府雇員 . 當局除了找到並刪除敏感內容外,通過大量充斥社交媒體的評論來分散批評政府人士的注意力 . 傳聞寫手每發一貼 , 收取五毛錢 , 是為五毛 . http://gking.harvard.edu/files/gking/files/50c.pdf?m=1463587807 http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/world/2016/05/160520_harvard_50_center_research 某黃絲網站主流意見 : 在國家民族大問題上 , 一定要非黑即白 , 不容灰色地帶 如不贊成或反對佔中 , 就是五毛 , 要死全家才有天理 . 以下是網站貼文 [#157] 五毛黨策略更新      >> ” 五毛有罪就要死全家 “ 嘩!乜咁惡毒既咒詛刀講得出!? 一面又話追求反獨裁统治,追求民主、民權、民生!一面又要罪及家人!兼要恢復死刑 ( 死全家殊九族 ) ! 似嚴重思覺失調多 D 喎! 黄五毛想蓝五毛死全家,咁藍五毛又要黄五毛點先合適呢!?哈 ... ( 待續 )